Banking UX

50 shades of banking

50 shades of banking. Image: Shutterstock
Written by Duena Blomstrom

We should be prepared to break up with our bank if it falls short of our relationship expectations. Story by Duena Blomstrom.

I’ve written about irrational loyalty in banking before, but a conversation at Money20/20 in Vegas last week prompted me to revisit it. Only, this time with the thesis that we as consumers have abnormally high pain thresholds when it comes to what we expect of banking as a service, and its technology as the manifestation of it. While I’m the first to glare, point and shake a bank, on this topic it’s not them, it’s us.

Duena Blomstrom's image of a person demonstrating their soft limits and hard limits when it comes to their relationship with their bank.“If my bank completely pissed me off I’d leave!” a friend proclaimed, and it made me wonder what ‘completely’ means to each of us. With the rise of the 50 Shades phenomenon in popular culture, we all know there have to be agreed limits even in a borderline abusive relationship. What are ours when it comes to being flogged by our bank? Shall we agree that money and data being safe is a hard limit? I think we should, or we’d be left with no core services we need out of banking.

Outside of that, would we leave if we were unable to open a new account for days? What if the interest rates were clearly lower than the market? What if the mortgages became suddenly and perceivably higher? Are these then soft limits; do we negotiate with ourselves whether the pain is bearable as compared to the perceived hustle of changing banks and end up staying?

When else do we entertain it? Do we even think about leaving when we’re left on hold for hours; when we need to enter our password for the 20th time and half our day was spent trying to log in to make a transfer online only to find no evident way to do it, and no evidence of what it costs to do so? Do we ever wonder why, when you call a telecom company, there’s a ‘Press 4 if you’re thinking of leaving us’, but when you call a bank there’s never that option?

Do we flirt with the idea of leaving every time we catch a glimpse of a challenger bank flaunting features we’ve never seen in our bank, or are they so far removed from our day-to-day digital banking experience we mentally categorize them as sci-fi?

If our bank’s mobile app is just another icon on a busy smartphone’s home screen, why is it we patiently allow it to load up twice as long and crush twice as much as every other app we use? What makes us accept we have to have ridiculous workarounds for the most basic of actions, such as spouses setting up direct debits, friends using PayPal to repay us, ATM withdrawals, and so on, only to load them back in the needed current account and our dead aunt’s maiden name tattooed on our wrist?

scooterMaybe it’s time we take some responsibility as consumers and admit that we’re enabling banks to mistreat us with no limits in place. Maybe it’s time we ask ourselves when enough is really enough, and why it is that we’d allow this much abuse in poor service and subpar technology when we sure don’t enjoy it.

Let’s make it an early New Year’s Eve resolution that, as of now, we’ll go to our bank with a mental list of what our limits are and be prepared to break up if they don’t respect them. They may learn to love us more that way.

– This article is reproduced with kind permission. Some minor changes have been made to reflect BankNXT style considerations. You can read the original article here. Main image: Shutterstock

About the author

Duena Blomstrom

Duena Blomstrom is an independent digital banking consultant, an entrepreneur and VC, a mentor for Startupbootcamp and Techstars, an uncomfortably opinionated blogger, and a public speaker at industry events.

Leave a Comment